Metals service centers · Utah

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork

Spanish Fork, UT · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade F.

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork: 5.6 TCR = 254% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork safety composite

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork: 3.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2018

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork's TCR rose 5.1 from 3.0 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Spanish Fork, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 254% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Scot Industries - Ea…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scot Industries - East Troy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork averages 5.6 TCR (254% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=8.1 · BLS 2.2

Where PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Metals service centers employers in Utah.

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork (58 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork
PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork (58 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

PDM Steel Service Center, Inc. - Spanish Fork has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 8.1 4.9 5 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · UT · Spanish Fork

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 49 employers in Spanish Fork, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scot Industries - East Troy 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Metal Supply Lakeland 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. Inc. - Nashville, TN 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copper and Brass Sales - South Bend 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE D46 Salt Lake City 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Petro West Inc 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5 Star Building Products 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boardwalk Cabinetry 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunroc Corporation 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Living Essential Oils - DC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nature's Sunshine Manufacturing facility 355 FTE
NAT-TCR JX Peterbilt - Grand Rapids 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Citrus County 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Imperial Dade Orlando 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus/Mount Carmel 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Faurecia - Lansing 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Joseph Residence 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atrium Post Acute Care of Lancaster 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atrium Post Acute Care of Neenah 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.