Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Peacock Acres Inc.

Salinas, CA · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peacock Acres Inc. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade A.

Peacock Acres Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 34% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peacock Acres Inc. safety composite

Peacock Acres Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peacock Acres Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.82× in 2020

Peacock Acres Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Salinas, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 34% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #8/91
  • PHOTO Gateway Woods Family…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gateway Woods Family Services, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Peacock Acres Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peacock Acres Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (34% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peacock Acres Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Peacock Acres Inc. falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Peacock Acres Inc. (43 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Peacock Acres Inc.
Peacock Acres Inc. (43 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Peacock Acres Inc. has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Salinas

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 337 employers in Salinas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gateway Woods Family Services, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Office 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-579170 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crossnore Communities for Children - Hendersonville Campus 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing 8,854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing-California 3,255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital 2,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Healthcare System 2,133 FTE
NAT-TCR Aflac Inc - Omaha 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR OPW Retail Fueling - Smithfield 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schiess Distributors, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland - Superior Products LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5076 - WA South Correctional Entity SCORE 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palletized Trucking, Inc.- Industrial 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coldmaster Temperature Control 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfax Hospice 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.