Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remodeling, renovating), single-family housing, general contractors · Indiana

Peacock and Company

South Bend, IN · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peacock and Company runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remodeling, renovating), single-family housing, general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Peacock and Company: 5.9 TCR = 155% of Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remodeling, renovating), single-family housing, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peacock and Company safety composite

Peacock and Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peacock and Company: 0.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Peacock and Company's TCR rose 6.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · South Bend, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/16
  • PHOTO Birmingham
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Birmingham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Peacock and Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peacock and Company averages 5.9 TCR (155% of the Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remodeling, renovating), single-family housing, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peacock and Company TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Peacock and Company falls in its industry

698 Home improvement (e.g., adding establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 16 Home improvement (e.g., adding employers in Indiana.

Peacock and Company (21 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Peacock and Company
Peacock and Company (21 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Peacock and Company has fewer employees than the Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remod median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 11.2 0.0 1 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.2 6.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · IN · South Bend

698 Home improvement (e.g., adding on, remodeling, renovating), single-family housing, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 318 employers in South Bend, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Birmingham 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Exteriors 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1-800 Hansons, LLC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office 82 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastside Dairy, LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deer Ridge 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 5 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 3 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital South Bend 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph County 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fourwinds Casino South Bend 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-TCR Arett Sales Corporation Troy 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Averill 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harry A. Poole, Sr., Contractor, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ward Contracting & Building Restoration 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Excel Truck Group Lexington 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beechwood Yaphank 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE R32 Clearwater FL 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE R12 Greater Mid-Hudson NY 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.