Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Peak Resources-Alamance

Graham, NC · ~115 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peak Resources-Alamance runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Peak Resources-Alamance: 21.4 TCR = 329% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peak Resources-Alamance safety composite

Peak Resources-Alamance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peak Resources-Alamance: 6.7 → 23.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 44.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2023

Peak Resources-Alamance's TCR rose 16.4 from 6.7 in 2017 to 23.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 44.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Graham, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 21.4 · 329% of ind

  • DART 23.1 DART
  • RANK #499/510
  • PHOTO Human Good Corporate…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Human Good Corporate Support Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Peak Resources-Alamance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peak Resources-Alamance averages 21.4 TCR (329% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peak Resources-Alamance TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=13.7 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=44.5 · 2021=16 · 2022=36.4 · 2023=23.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Peak Resources-Alamance falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #499 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Peak Resources-Alamance (115 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Peak Resources-Alamance
Peak Resources-Alamance (115 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Peak Resources-Alamance has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 23.1 23.1 1 15 0
2022 36.4 36.4 0 25 0
2021 16.0 13.0 5 16 0
2020 44.5 43.1 4 28 0
2019 9.3 5.2 8 1 0
2018 13.7 6.8 14 0 0
2017 6.7 1.3 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Graham

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 29 employers in Graham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Human Good Corporate Support Center 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Health- Hoopeston 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Samaritan Society-Luther Manor 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_343 21.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Electric Membership Corp. Supply District 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE County of Harnett-Harnett Regional Water 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heavy Highway 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comfort Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alamance County 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alamance Foods Cedar Crest 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buckner Heavylift Cranes, LLC. 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASPE-South LLC 146 FTE
NAT-TCR Carolina Catering Corp. DBA Sky Caterers 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Augustana Chapel View #092 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Homestead Gardens, Inc. - SP Retail 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria MW LLC - Distribution 21.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burns Harbor, IN 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Packaging - Brooklyn Park, MN 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE HGR Industrial Surplus 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9215-SRQ 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.