Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing · Connecticut

Pearse Bertram

Bloomfield, CT · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pearse Bertram runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pearse Bertram: 2.9 TCR = 87% of Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pearse Bertram safety composite

Pearse Bertram scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pearse Bertram: 2.5 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2023

Pearse Bertram's TCR rose 1.6 from 2.5 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Bloomfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Flight Systems Indus…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flight Systems Industrial Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Pearse Bertram in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pearse Bertram averages 2.9 TCR (87% of the Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pearse Bertram TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.7 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pearse Bertram falls in its industry

322 Controllers for process variab establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Controllers for process variab employers in Connecticut.

Pearse Bertram (43 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Pearse Bertram
Pearse Bertram (43 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Pearse Bertram has fewer employees than the Controllers for process variables (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 0 1 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · CT · Bloomfield

322 Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bloomfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flight Systems Industrial Products 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIKA Sensor Technology 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Endress+Hauser Flowtec AG USA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRC Global - 093 La Porte, TX (VEC) 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middletown Power LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bismark Construction Company, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paganelli Construction Corp 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomfield HomeGoods DC 1,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.G. Conn. Merchants,LLC 1,168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otis Elevator Company-Otis Service Center 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kamatics Corporation 505 FTE
NAT-TCR Christmas Casino 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Myers- CF 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR New Bern Mill 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Valley Rice, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lodging Kit Company 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers Industrial Products, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Forest Products, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manitou Equipment America LLC - Belvidere 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.