Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · Mississippi

Peco Foods Processing Plant

Sebastopol, MS · ~1,050 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peco Foods Processing Plant runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade B.

Peco Foods Processing Plant: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peco Foods Processing Plant safety composite

Peco Foods Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2019

Peco Foods Processing Plant injury rate improved

Peco Foods Processing Plant's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Sebastopol, MS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #3/41
  • PHOTO International Dehydr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~1,050 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Dehydrated Foods, Inc. - Monett (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Peco Foods Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peco Foods Processing Plant averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peco Foods Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Peco Foods Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 41 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Mississippi.

Peco Foods Processing Plant (1,050 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Peco Foods Processing Plant
Peco Foods Processing Plant (1,050 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Peco Foods Processing Plant has more employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.4 1.0 11 4 0
2018 1.1 0.8 10 1 0
2017 1.8 1.5 19 0 0
2016 2.3 2.1 23 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Sebastopol

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 8 employers in Sebastopol, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Dehydrated Foods, Inc. - Monett 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equity Group Eufaula Division LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2nd Street, P-19719 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Soules Foods 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ripley Facility 1,043 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle 1,042 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6011 1,032 FTE
STATE-SIZE HORSESHOE TUNICA HOTEL & CASINO 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sebastopol Processing 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Farms Live Haul 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Foods Inc- Sebastopol Live 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Farms Sebastopol Hatchery 43 FTE
NAT-TCR 52nd Avenue Clinic 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MGRC Livermore 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Smiths Medical - Gary 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Tudor Wharf 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tucson HomeGoods Distribution Center 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premium Packing, Inc. 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Marriott Marco Island Beach Resort 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weston Solutions Inc. 1,050 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.