Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing · Illinois

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main

Bradley, IL · ~232 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main: 4.2 TCR = 126% of Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main safety composite

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2024

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main injury rate improved

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main's TCR fell 4.4 from 8.2 in 2017 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Bradley, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 126% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #18/35
  • PHOTO Iten Industries Plan…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iten Industries Plant 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peddinghaus Corporation - Main averages 4.2 TCR (126% of the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main TCR series: 2017=8.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Peddinghaus Corporation - Main falls in its industry

391 Sheet metal forming machines m establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 35 Sheet metal forming machines m employers in Illinois.

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main (232 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Peddinghaus Corporation - Main
Peddinghaus Corporation - Main (232 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Peddinghaus Corporation - Main has more employees than the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 1.1 10 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 6 0 0
2020 3.9 1.7 7 0 0
2019 6.1 3.3 13 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 10 0 0
2017 8.2 0.9 17 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · IL · Bradley

391 Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 22 employers in Bradley, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iten Industries Plant 2 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lomar Machine & Tool Co. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amity Mold Company 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Tool Group Lake Charles NG 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Paper Corporation 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCC Corporate 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auto Truck Chicago 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAI-0032-0032-03487 FAC-03487-EVANSTON-IL 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring LLC 1,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradley-Bourbonnais CHSD #307 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR 301 - Bradley 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradley SD #61 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Watertown 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid America Pet Food LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Moffat Contracting Services, LLC. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suites Tampa 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monument Chemical, Brandenburg KY 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05951 - WM of New England Area Office 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE IKEA #511 Columbus 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raytheon_Huntsville_AL_Bob Heath Drive 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.