Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges · Georgia

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA

Richmond Hill, GA · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges workplace, earning a grade D.

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA: 4.8 TCR = 170% of Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA safety composite

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA: 4.2 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA's TCR rose 1.1 from 4.2 in 2023 to 5.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Richmond Hill, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 170% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #41/62
  • PHOTO ATS-Pflugerville
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATS-Pflugerville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA averages 4.8 TCR (170% of the Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA TCR series: 2023=4.2 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA falls in its industry

4,078 Painting lines on highways, st establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 62 Painting lines on highways, st employers in Georgia.

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA (36 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA
Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA (36 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Peek Pavement Marking Richmond Hill, GA has fewer employees than the Painting lines on highways, streets and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · GA · Richmond Hill

4,078 Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 24 employers in Richmond Hill, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATS-Pflugerville 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evolution Construction Services, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4301 - High Point, NC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keeler Construction 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Greenhouse Systems, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Stephen County hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lavonia Hatchery 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caesarstone Technologies, USA Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 011-00688 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caesarstone 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1154 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Careone at Weymouth 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Boone County Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Costa Delray, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryan Tx 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Care Sheet Metal & Roofing, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greene Welding Hardware 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lehigh Children's Academy 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Hybrid Companies LLC 10 Hudson Yards 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.