Electric power generation, wind · Texas

Penascal

Sarita, TX · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penascal runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, wind workplace, earning a grade F.

Penascal: 4.1 TCR = 343% of Electric power generation, wind BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penascal safety composite

Penascal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Penascal injury rate improved

Penascal's TCR fell 1.5 from 6.4 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221115 · Sarita, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.1 · 343% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #20/22
  • PHOTO Stateline
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stateline (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Penascal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penascal averages 4.1 TCR (343% of the Electric power generation, wind BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Penascal TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=4.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Penascal falls in its industry

64 Electric power generation, win establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 22 Electric power generation, win employers in Texas.

Penascal (29 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Penascal
Penascal (29 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Penascal has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, wind median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 9.2 0.0 3 0 0
2016 6.4 3.2 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221115 · TX · Sarita

64 Electric power generation, wind employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stateline 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EC&R Services, LLC-Panther Creek I & II 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avangrid Renewables - PenascalI & II 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terra-Gen Cameron Ridge/Pacific Crest/Ridgetop Energy 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Uhl Company, Inc - Duluth 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sedano's Supermarket #16 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Wilmette 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA of Greater Erie 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Destination Resorts Vail 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Litex-Hillsdale 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PNS-SPUSA 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcadia Chair Company - F3 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.