Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Pennsylvania

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc

York, PA · ~106 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc: 3.4 TCR = 164% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc safety composite

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc: 3.4 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2021

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc's TCR rose 0.9 from 3.4 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · York, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #88/137
  • PHOTO Smart Care Equipment…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smart Care Equipment Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pengate Handling Systems, Inc averages 3.4 TCR (164% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=4.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Pengate Handling Systems, Inc falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 137 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Pennsylvania.

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc (106 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pengate Handling Systems, Inc
Pengate Handling Systems, Inc (106 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Pengate Handling Systems, Inc has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 5 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · PA · York

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smart Care Equipment Solutions 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Busch, LLC Houston 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Southwest District : SVC-Phoenix AZ-USA 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raymond of New Jersey 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE McKeesport 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Bros Construction Inc 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-PIT 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE GWS Lehigh 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Keene FST (KNEWD) 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SAS Services San Diego, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR VCM - Morley 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ogden Distribution Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benedictine Living Community of Ada 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&L, Incorporated 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluid Management 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.