Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir

Rolling Hils Estates, CA · ~17 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir runs at 463% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir: 17.6 TCR = 463% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir safety composite

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir: 0.0 → 35.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 35.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir's TCR rose 35.2 from 0.0 in 2023 to 35.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Rolling Hils Estates, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 463% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #191/216
  • PHOTO Moose Lake Mercy Cam…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moose Lake Mercy Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peninsula Pointe by Cogir averages 17.6 TCR (463% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=35.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Peninsula Pointe by Cogir falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir (17 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Peninsula Pointe by Cogir
Peninsula Pointe by Cogir (17 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Peninsula Pointe by Cogir has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 35.2 0.0 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Rolling Hils Estates

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moose Lake Mercy Campus 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSL RYE INVESTORS LLC 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terrace Glen Village (CCRC of Cedar Rapids, LLC) 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Strive at Fern Park 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Dixon Research Station 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laub Ranches Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sherwood Equipment Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barton Ranch, Inc. 17 FTE
NAT-TCR Staten Island 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HW East NY 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 205 Evergreen Truss 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG220 17.6 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.