Rods, metal (except precious), merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina

Stanley, NC · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina runs at 649% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rods, metal (except precious), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina: 14.3 TCR = 649% of Rods, metal (except precious), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina safety composite

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.0

2022→2023

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina injury rate improved

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina's TCR fell 24.0 from 26.3 in 2022 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=26.3 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Stanley, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 649% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/41
  • PHOTO Denver
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Denver (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina averages 14.3 TCR (649% of the Rods, metal (except precious), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina TCR series: 2022=26.3 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina falls in its industry

1,299 Rods, metal (except precious), establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 41 Rods, metal (except precious), employers in North Carolina.

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina (52 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina
Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina (52 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Pennsylvania Steel- North Carolina has more employees than the Rods, metal (except precious), merchant median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 26.3 16.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · NC · Stanley

1,299 Rods, metal (except precious), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 12 employers in Stanley, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Denver 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tubular Steel, Inc. 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeKalb Iron and Metal LLC 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magic Steel Corporation - Trinity AL 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sutton Energy Complex CC/CT 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windsor Investments LLC d/b/a Windsor Homes 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Covington Construction Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blum Inc. 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prestige Site Works, LLC 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Earnhardt Grading Inc. 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Johnson Professional USA, Inc. 87 FTE
NAT-TCR Connersville Utilities 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips Manufacturing & Tower Co 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR International Glace, Inc. 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrier Clinic 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand View Alzheimer's Special Care Center 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Street Maintenance 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin 804 Texas 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thousand Islands Winery LLC 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.