Power transformers, electric, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc

Canonsburg, PA · ~309 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power transformers, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc: 7.6 TCR = 231% of Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc safety composite

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2019→2021

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc injury rate improved

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc's TCR fell 6.2 from 10.2 in 2019 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335311 · Canonsburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 231% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO ERMCO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~309 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ERMCO (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc averages 7.6 TCR (231% of the Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc TCR series: 2019=10.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc falls in its industry

141 Power transformers, electric, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Power transformers, electric, employers in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc (309 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc
Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc (309 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology, Inc has more employees than the Power transformers, electric, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 2.5 19 0 0
2020 8.6 5.5 28 0 0
2019 10.2 5.4 33 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335311 · PA · Canonsburg

141 Power transformers, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 63 employers in Canonsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ERMCO 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Power Systems 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitran Corporation 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howard Industries Inc. (Substation) 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Sales North East 309 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5089 PITTSTON RDC 309 FTE
STATE-SIZE CNX Resources Corporation 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridge and Decking Constrution 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSSI, Inc. dba Songer Services 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arc Human Services 650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lighthouse Electric Company, Inc. 616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starline Holdings,LLC 516 FTE
NAT-TCR Carstin Brands 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bruce Kreofsky & Sons, Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 10664 Orange Village 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 348 - Rural Community Concept 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shoprite of Bayville 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoprite of Lacey 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Cypress CA 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Air 309 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.