Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Wisconsin

Performance Freight Systems, Inc.

Milwaukee, WI · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Performance Freight Systems, Inc.: 6.1 TCR = 135% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. safety composite

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2021→2023

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Performance Freight Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.8 from 9.0 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=9.0 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #46/100
  • PHOTO XDP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: XDP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Performance Freight Systems, Inc. averages 6.1 TCR (135% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2021=9 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Performance Freight Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

3,020 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 100 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Wisconsin.

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Performance Freight Systems, Inc.
Performance Freight Systems, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Performance Freight Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2021 9.0 3.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · WI · Milwaukee

3,020 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR XDP 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Transport - 029 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Distribution LLC 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UNC - Syracuse Depot 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Green 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Sires Inc Westby 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Sires, Inc - Wisconsin 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Custer 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Pratt Regional Medical Center 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR STARS only 801 Merrick Avenue 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bashas 160 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Barbara Grocery Outlet 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brock Supply Co. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ver-tech 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond R Fertilizer Co Inc - Winter Garden 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administrative Offices 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.