Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing · Idaho

PerforMix - Nampa

Nampa, ID · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PerforMix - Nampa runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

PerforMix - Nampa: 8.2 TCR = 209% of Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PerforMix - Nampa safety composite

PerforMix - Nampa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PerforMix - Nampa: 7.3 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

PerforMix - Nampa's TCR rose 1.6 from 7.3 in 2018 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Nampa, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 209% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO feed milling and gra…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: feed milling and grain handling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

PerforMix - Nampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PerforMix - Nampa averages 8.2 TCR (209% of the Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PerforMix - Nampa TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.9

Where PerforMix - Nampa falls in its industry

756 Cattle feeds, supplements, con establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Cattle feeds, supplements, con employers in Idaho.

PerforMix - Nampa (44 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PerforMix - Nampa
PerforMix - Nampa (44 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

PerforMix - Nampa has more employees than the Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 4.5 4 0 0
2023 6.7 2.2 3 0 0
2022 8.9 6.7 1 3 0
2021 11.4 9.2 4 1 0
2020 11.4 6.9 3 2 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 7.3 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · ID · Nampa

756 Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR feed milling and grain handling 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelbyville Feed Mill 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunbird 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&D Ingredient Distributors, Inc. 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Owyhee Produce LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walters Produce Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain States Roofing, Incorporated 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marv's Insulation 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Scranton Manufacturing 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Runnings of Willmar 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stupp Bridge Co 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Locust Ridge Healthcare LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newport Industrial Fabrication 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1265 PYP Anaheim 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sendero Power Line Construction, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perfecto Industries, Inc. - Gaylord 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.