Print shops, engraving (except printing books) · Colorado

Personalized Lazer Designs

Broomfield, CO · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Personalized Lazer Designs runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Print shops, engraving (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade C.

Personalized Lazer Designs: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Print shops, engraving (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Personalized Lazer Designs safety composite

Personalized Lazer Designs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Personalized Lazer Designs held a steady TCR band

Personalized Lazer Designs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Broomfield, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/23
  • PHOTO Envision Printing, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Envision Printing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Personalized Lazer Designs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Personalized Lazer Designs averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Print shops, engraving (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Personalized Lazer Designs TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Personalized Lazer Designs falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, engraving (except establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 23 Print shops, engraving (except employers in Colorado.

Personalized Lazer Designs (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Personalized Lazer Designs
Personalized Lazer Designs (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Personalized Lazer Designs has fewer employees than the Print shops, engraving (except printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CO · Broomfield

2,001 Print shops, engraving (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 136 employers in Broomfield, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intellicor PSNJ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broadridge Financial 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CORPORATE 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Three Barrel Brewing Co.,LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado- Colorado Springs Utilities 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sampson Construction - Johnstown, CO 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 5243 - Fort Collins 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flatiron 2,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR RES 1,131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ball Corporate Campus Denver 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Douglas Broomfield 1,029 FTE
NAT-TCR Point32Health Providence 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Point32Health Quincy 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Koeze Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Utica Lodging Group, LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Lee Florida 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 34-IL 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parnell & Associates Inc 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.