Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking · California

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET

Petaluma, CA · ~62 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking workplace, earning a grade D.

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET: 7.6 TCR = 170% of Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET safety composite

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.3

2016→2024

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET injury rate improved

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET's TCR fell 12.3 from 14.5 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.5 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Petaluma, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.6 · 170% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #191/273
  • PHOTO Hagerstown MD FXFE-HGR
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hagerstown MD FXFE-HGR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petaluma CA FXFE-PET averages 7.6 TCR (170% of the Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET TCR series: 2016=14.5 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=6 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Petaluma CA FXFE-PET falls in its industry

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Fr establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 273 Less Than Truckload General Fr employers in California.

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET (62 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Petaluma CA FXFE-PET
Petaluma CA FXFE-PET (62 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Petaluma CA FXFE-PET has more employees than the Less Than Truckload General Freight Truc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2022 9.3 9.3 6 0 0
2021 9.4 6.3 6 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 3 0 0
2019 6.6 4.9 4 0 0
2016 14.5 9.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · CA · Petaluma

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hagerstown MD FXFE-HGR 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN MOVING AND STORAGE, LLC 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RALEIGH RAL 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR XSL 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zipper Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crain Marketing, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maricopa Orchards, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTLAND ORCHIDS 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Hagerstown MD FXFE-HGR 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Livingston County 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bsl Woodbury Operations Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland ME FXFE-PLD 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubbock TX FXFE-LBB 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winchester VA FXFE-WCV 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dragon Products Provo 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.