Grape farming without making wine · California

Petersen Land Management, Inc

Geyserville, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petersen Land Management, Inc runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Grape farming without making wine workplace, earning a grade D.

Petersen Land Management, Inc: 8.6 TCR = 190% of Grape farming without making wine BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petersen Land Management, Inc safety composite

Petersen Land Management, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2024

Petersen Land Management, Inc injury rate improved

Petersen Land Management, Inc's TCR fell 3.3 from 9.7 in 2017 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 119.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.7 · 2018=119.7 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111332 · Geyserville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 190% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #126/151
  • PHOTO Milicic Farming LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milicic Farming LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Petersen Land Management, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petersen Land Management, Inc averages 8.6 TCR (190% of the Grape farming without making wine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petersen Land Management, Inc TCR series: 2017=9.7 · 2018=119.7 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Petersen Land Management, Inc falls in its industry

162 Grape farming without making w establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 151 Grape farming without making w employers in California.

Petersen Land Management, Inc (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Petersen Land Management, Inc
Petersen Land Management, Inc (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Petersen Land Management, Inc has fewer employees than the Grape farming without making wine median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 1 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2022 19.8 19.8 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 18.1 12.0 3 0 0
2018 119.7 119.7 2 0 0
2017 9.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111332 · CA · Geyserville

162 Grape farming without making wine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 20 employers in Geyserville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milicic Farming LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CADY2 - 05 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR VF - Healdsburg 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 398 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redwood Empire Vineyard Management 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Coast Vineyard Management Inc 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Francis Coppola Winery 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Cady Bag Company, LLC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR L & L Construction, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jones Truck & Equipment LLC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hungerford Growers Gin, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lahey Hamilton 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Farmer's Branch Irving 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDT Global Mansfield 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Region I ESV 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.