Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · Texas

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin

Austin, TX · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade C.

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin: 3.8 TCR = 83% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin safety composite

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin: 4.5 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2022

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin's TCR rose 1.8 from 4.5 in 2018 to 6.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #89/118
  • PHOTO KAG West 52061 Eugene
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KAG West 52061 Eugene (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin averages 3.8 TCR (83% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=8 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 118 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Texas.

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin (28 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin
Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin (28 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Petro-Chemical Transport 51090 Austin has fewer employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.2 4.2 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · TX · Austin

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KAG West 52061 Eugene 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA Trucking (Aberdeen) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHARLES E IRELAND LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Tank Depot 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR KAG West 52061 Eugene 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flrvb - West Palm Beach 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Line Equipment - Allentown 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Latham, NY 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trulieve Lady Lake 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0032 Tyson Foods Inc. - Council Bluffs 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG804 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerry Greenville 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.