Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · Texas

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington

Irving, TX · ~72 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade C.

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington: 4.2 TCR = 93% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington safety composite

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2022

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington injury rate improved

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.0 in 2021 to 3.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.0 · 2022=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Irving, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 93% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #94/118
  • PHOTO Caron USA - Texas
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caron USA - Texas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington averages 4.2 TCR (93% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington TCR series: 2021=5 · 2022=3.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 118 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Texas.

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington (72 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington
Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington (72 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.3 3.3 4 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · TX · Irving

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 548 employers in Irving, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caron USA - Texas 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONNORS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Technologies Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunoco Transportation Aloha 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Rice 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes Foods Inc / Hatchery 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-MIDLAND 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50CP001 CORP LAS COLINAS 4,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXC101551 2,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Corporation 2727 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RBD5 1,964 FTE
NAT-TCR Zapp Precision Wire, Inc 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR O-Lakeland Printing 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Streator Dependable Manufacturing 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian Health Pediatrics 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0654 Empire Packing Company L.P. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE GB Fabrication 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Joaquin County Agricultural Department 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liqui-Box Upper Sandusky 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.