Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Connecticut

PFC-CT

Woodbridge, CT · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PFC-CT runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

PFC-CT: 4.2 TCR = 126% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PFC-CT safety composite

PFC-CT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

PFC-CT injury rate improved

PFC-CT's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Woodbridge, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 126% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/33
  • PHOTO 7369_17258
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7369_17258 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

PFC-CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PFC-CT averages 4.2 TCR (126% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PFC-CT TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where PFC-CT falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 33 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in Connecticut.

PFC-CT (24 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PFC-CT
PFC-CT (24 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

PFC-CT has fewer employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.8 14.8 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.2 4.6 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · CT · Woodbridge

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 16 employers in Woodbridge, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7369_17258 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inhance Technologies LLC - 70 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Techniplas 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Letica-Alabama 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport Energy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Haven Waste Water Treatment 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Hartford Filters 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCE Fine Builders, Inc. 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Administrative Office 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Woodbridge 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR B-X Woodbridge LLC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connecticut Office 94 FTE
NAT-TCR ULA-Harlingen 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ChoreTime Decatur 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KMC Plant #1 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #27 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Qrp - Alp 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Payne 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriGreen Equipment Leighton 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE GVT-Brunswick 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.