Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · Nebraska

PFF

Hastings, NE · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PFF runs at 484% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade F.

PFF: 21.8 TCR = 484% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PFF safety composite

PFF scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

PFF injury rate improved

PFF's TCR fell 3.3 from 19.3 in 2016 to 16.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 37.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.3 · 2017=20.4 · 2018=35.9 · 2019=30.6 · 2020=18.1 · 2021=37.0 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=16.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Hastings, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.8 · 484% of ind

  • DART 16.0 DART
  • RANK #42/42
  • PHOTO Dogwood Sow Unit
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dogwood Sow Unit (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

PFF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PFF averages 21.8 TCR (484% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PFF TCR series: 2016=19.3 · 2017=20.4 · 2018=35.9 · 2019=30.6 · 2020=18.1 · 2021=37 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=16 · BLS 4.5

Where PFF falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 42 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in Nebraska.

PFF (26 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate PFF
PFF (26 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

PFF has more employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.0 16.0 5 0 0
2023 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2022 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2021 37.0 29.6 10 0 0
2020 18.1 10.9 5 0 0
2019 30.6 18.4 10 0 0
2018 35.9 23.9 9 0 0
2017 20.4 16.3 5 0 0
2016 19.3 15.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · NE · Hastings

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 65 employers in Hastings, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dogwood Sow Unit 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Handlos South 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stateline 22.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newell Pig II 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Timber Ridge 12347 445th Street Leigh NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Willow Creek NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farners Pride - Battle Creek Location 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butler Public Power District 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital 1,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR WR Reserve 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Animal Humane Society - CR 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Raleigh 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWAN 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LongMeadow 21.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canyon River Electric 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Budget Car Mart 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMMM San Antonio #2, LTD 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE M & C Meat Market, LTD. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.