Precision equipment calibration · North Carolina

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI)

Raleigh, NC · ~134 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Precision equipment calibration workplace, earning a grade A.

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI): 0.1 TCR = 7% of Precision equipment calibration BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) safety composite

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI): 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 0.7 TCR · DART/TCR 5.14× in 2020

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI)'s TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 5.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811219 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Philips NAM Alpharet…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Philips NAM Alpharetta, GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) averages 0.1 TCR (7% of the Precision equipment calibration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) falls in its industry

56 Precision equipment calibratio establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Precision equipment calibratio employers in North Carolina.

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) (134 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI)
Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) (134 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) has fewer employees than the Precision equipment calibration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811219 · NC · Raleigh

56 Precision equipment calibration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM Alpharetta, GA 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RALEIGH HDQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM CCSC Alpharetta, GA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varian, Washington DC 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SEE Holdings LLC dba SouthEnd Exteriors 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boggs Contracting 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burford Construction Indiana Statewide Operations 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loparex 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Office - H1 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR QPS Engineering, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NV-01 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-01 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartland of Kettering 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swift County 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland of Miamisburg 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verdae Practices 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.