Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, sonar) repair and maintenance services · Massachusetts

Philips Healthcare

Andover, MA · ~2,279 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Philips Healthcare runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, sonar) repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Philips Healthcare: 0.5 TCR = 21% of Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, sonar) repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Philips Healthcare safety composite

Philips Healthcare scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Philips Healthcare held a steady TCR band

Philips Healthcare's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811219 · Andover, MA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO AIC Center Valley
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~2,279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AIC Center Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Philips Healthcare in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Philips Healthcare averages 0.5 TCR (21% of the Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, sonar) repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Philips Healthcare TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Philips Healthcare falls in its industry

56 Navigational instruments (e.g. establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Navigational instruments (e.g. employers in Massachusetts.

Philips Healthcare (2,279 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Philips Healthcare
Philips Healthcare (2,279 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Philips Healthcare has more employees than the Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.3 0.1 6 0 0
2018 0.3 0.1 7 0 0
2017 0.6 0.1 8 5 0
2016 0.6 0.3 9 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811219 · MA · Andover

56 Navigational instruments (e.g., radar, sonar) repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 78 employers in Andover, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AIC Center Valley 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baxter Healthcare Largo 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM Highland Heights OH 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varian, Schiller Park 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pfizer, Inc. 2,276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc. 2,272 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Foundation Of The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 2,270 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowell General Hospital 2,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips NAM Field Sales & Service 4,812 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Andover_MA 4,577 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smith & Nephew 150 MMP 1,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Biotech Andover 1,381 FTE
NAT-TCR Dierbergs Central Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Roche Operation LTD 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AM Conservation 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Occasions Group Inc - 0060-TXWA1 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shea Medical Center Campus 2,280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pse&G Gas Delivery 2,281 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hp - 8170 2,277 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center, Ltd. 2,281 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.