Fire alarm system, electric, installation only · Kansas

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc

Wichita, KS · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire alarm system, electric, installation only workplace, earning a grade D.

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc: 3.6 TCR = 128% of Fire alarm system, electric, installation only BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc safety composite

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc: 3.8 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.74× in 2024

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc's TCR rose 3.7 from 3.8 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Wichita, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 128% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #27/41
  • PHOTO South Houston
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc averages 3.6 TCR (128% of the Fire alarm system, electric, installation only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=10.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Fire alarm system, electric, i establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 41 Fire alarm system, electric, i employers in Kansas.

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc (50 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc
Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc (50 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Phillips Southern Electric Co., Inc has fewer employees than the Fire alarm system, electric, installatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 6.2 6 0 1
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.7 8.9 6 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · KS · Wichita

4,550 Fire alarm system, electric, installation only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Houston 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milad Contracting Corp. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Long Electric Co 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rex Electric & Technologies, LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ford County Feed Yard, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ford County Feeders LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Cattle Feeders North #2 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4 Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR C. F. Martin & Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR United Aeronautical Corporation 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lithia Springs 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SODEXO AT MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL and MED CTR 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fargo Truss Systems 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waycross Ga 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE ChefZone 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shreveport Purina Feed Mill 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.