Landscape care and maintenance services · South Carolina

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia

Taylors, SC · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia: 7.0 TCR = 155% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia safety composite

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia: 0.0 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia's TCR rose 8.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Taylors, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/32
  • PHOTO West Orlando
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Orlando (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia averages 7.0 TCR (155% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=8.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 32 Landscape care and maintenance employers in South Carolina.

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia (23 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia
Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia (23 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Phoenix Landscape Management of Columbia has fewer employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 12.8 8.5 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · SC · Taylors

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 24 employers in Taylors, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Orlando 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JT Lawn Service 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kline Bros Landscaping Center, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5112 - Augusta 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRI COUNTY COTTON GROWERS, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartsville Complex 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLYTHEWOOD CREW QUARTERS 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1244 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1244 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1937 - Greer 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Steel LLC 180 FTE
NAT-TCR L3 Unidyne Jacksonville 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marinemax East, Inc.-Oln 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 900 Aventura Restaurant LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Claremore Nursing Home 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaGrange - Carton Plant 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bissell Mexico Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mashpee CCI 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molding Corporation of America 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.