Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Texas

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05

Fort Worth, TX · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05: 8.5 TCR = 258% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 safety composite

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2023→2024

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 injury rate improved

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05's TCR fell 3.9 from 10.4 in 2023 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=10.4 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 258% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #19/22
  • PHOTO S&K Products Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S&K Products Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 averages 8.5 TCR (258% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 TCR series: 2023=10.4 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 22 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Texas.

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 (34 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05
Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 (34 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Phoenix Stamping Group PLT05 has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 4.4 3 0 0
2023 10.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · TX · Fort Worth

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S&K Products Company 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Resource- CT Division 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roesch Acquisitons LLC 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Perforating Company 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 165 Nashville 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmer Candy Company Bluff St 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenwood Bickford 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 338-Oakdale 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Vista Courtyard 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056 Birmingham AL 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worthington Place 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siloam Hatchery 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.