Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services · Ohio

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC

Springboro, OH · ~107 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services workplace, earning a grade D.

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC: 1.0 TCR = 194% of Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC safety composite

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC held a steady TCR band

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Springboro, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.0 · 194% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO Chicago Testing Labo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago Testing Laboratory, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC averages 1.0 TCR (194% of the Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC falls in its industry

232 Laboratory testing (except med establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Laboratory testing (except med employers in Ohio.

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC (107 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC
Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC (107 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Phoenix TEQ - Cincinnati, LLC has more employees than the Laboratory testing (except medical, vete median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 2.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · OH · Springboro

232 Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 39 employers in Springboro, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago Testing Laboratory, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janssen Titusville 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Proving Ground 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Element Minneapolis-Bloomington 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 292-NiSource-Columbus OH-East Op Ctr 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEILERCO 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Aluminum Corporation 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reliable Contractors Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN OHIO PIZZA INC 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kelchner Inc. 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 014-00925 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAT100 192 FTE
NAT-TCR Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 35 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Track Services 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR K-Line Industries, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TAC Air - DAL 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CENTRAL RANCH Loc.#12 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Commons at TallPines 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9215-JAN 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #417 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.