Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Massachusetts

Photofabrication Engineering Inc.

Milford, MA · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Photofabrication Engineering Inc.: 7.1 TCR = 215% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. safety composite

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2019→2024

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. injury rate improved

Photofabrication Engineering Inc.'s TCR fell 7.5 from 14.2 in 2019 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Milford, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 215% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/26
  • PHOTO Fulton County Proces…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fulton County Processing (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Photofabrication Engineering Inc. averages 7.1 TCR (215% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. TCR series: 2019=14.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=7 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Photofabrication Engineering Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 26 Electroplating metals and form employers in Massachusetts.

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. (57 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Photofabrication Engineering Inc.
Photofabrication Engineering Inc. (57 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Photofabrication Engineering Inc. has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 0.0 6 1 0
2023 7.0 3.5 3 1 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 10.6 0.0 5 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 14.2 0.0 1 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MA · Milford

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 71 employers in Milford, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fulton County Processing 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEX PLATING INCORPORATED 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Plating Works, Inc. Los Angeles 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duracoatings Holdings, LLC 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delphi Construction Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timberline Construction Corporation 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbert & Becker Co., Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE John F. Shea Co., Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waters- Milford 2,393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waters Corporation Milford, MA and Field 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRMC 1,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Consigli Construction Company, Inc. 1,686 FTE
NAT-TCR The Christian Village 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Smyth County Machine and Fabrication LLC 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora Energy, LLC 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Franco Associates 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Premier Relocations 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Latva Machine 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado Cleanup Corporation 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Lexus Newport News 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.