Roofing contractors · North Carolina

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc.

Marshville, NC · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. safety composite

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Marshville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/54
  • PHOTO Protech Roofing Syst…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Protech Roofing Systems LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 54 Roofing contractors employers in North Carolina.

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc.
Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Piedmont Commercial Roofing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · NC · Marshville

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 21 employers in Marshville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Protech Roofing Systems LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Roofing-Sheet Metal 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Preferred Construction Services, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AOCG, Inc. (Charlotte, NC) 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timothy Yarbrough 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty NC Breeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCJA1-SEL-JASON 1' 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunburst Trout Farms 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marshville Plant 709 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Wood Products, Inc. 674 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC Operations 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Wood Products - Marshville Plant 331 FTE
NAT-TCR Robinson Construction, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NB-Oliver Health Care Packaging 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alan Entertainment Holdings, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Arkansas Construction 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sowa Enterprises inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASH-VTA-ASHBURN 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE WIM004 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE WAV002 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.