Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Georgia

Piedmont Heart Institute

Atlanta, GA · ~778 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont Heart Institute runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Piedmont Heart Institute: 3.8 TCR = 100% of Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont Heart Institute safety composite

Piedmont Heart Institute scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Piedmont Heart Institute: 2.3 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.15× in 2023

Piedmont Heart Institute's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.3 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #22/37
  • PHOTO 158 East 84th Street
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~778 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 158 East 84th Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont Heart Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont Heart Institute averages 3.8 TCR (100% of the Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont Heart Institute TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=6.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Piedmont Heart Institute falls in its industry

2,836 Physicians' (except mental hea establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 37 Physicians' (except mental hea employers in Georgia.

Piedmont Heart Institute (778 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont Heart Institute
Piedmont Heart Institute (778 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Piedmont Heart Institute has more employees than the Physicians' (except mental health) offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 0.6 20 1 0
2022 4.2 0.9 25 4 0
2020 6.1 1.8 31 7 0
2019 3.6 0.3 23 0 0
2018 3.6 0.3 22 0 0
2017 2.3 0.2 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · GA · Atlanta

2,836 Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 158 East 84th Street 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Clinica 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30710) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30763) 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mannington Commercial 778 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DAT2 778 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATRIUM HEALTH FLOYD 779 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Castle Hayne Ready Mix Plant 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gundlach Champion, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Peabody General Contractors 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nev's Ink Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Txmyk - Mykawa 778 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Kirkland 778 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greensboro Distribution 778 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SLC9 778 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.