Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Piedmont National Corp.

Atlanta, GA · ~256 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont National Corp. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Piedmont National Corp.: 1.2 TCR = 55% of Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont National Corp. safety composite

Piedmont National Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Piedmont National Corp. injury rate improved

Piedmont National Corp.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Victory Packaging Cl…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Victory Packaging Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont National Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont National Corp. averages 1.2 TCR (55% of the Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont National Corp. TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Piedmont National Corp. falls in its industry

290 Bags, paper and disposable pla establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Bags, paper and disposable pla employers in Georgia.

Piedmont National Corp. (256 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont National Corp.
Piedmont National Corp. (256 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Piedmont National Corp. has more employees than the Bags, paper and disposable plastics, mer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 5 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · GA · Atlanta

290 Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Cleveland 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - NE011 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - SC008 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - MI012 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Atlanta 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kabobs 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meyn America LLC 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM GEORGIA 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Reasbeck Construction Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR XL Contracting Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Controls Corp. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Planer Mill 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riggs Tree Service 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE OHRH, LLC (d/b/a OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital) 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE PBV-St. Pauls 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Hills 256 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.