Central air-conditioning equipment installation · North Carolina

Piedmont Service Group

Raleigh, NC · ~294 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont Service Group runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Central air-conditioning equipment installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Piedmont Service Group: 2.4 TCR = 86% of Central air-conditioning equipment installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont Service Group safety composite

Piedmont Service Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Piedmont Service Group injury rate improved

Piedmont Service Group's TCR fell 4.8 from 7.2 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #88/212
  • PHOTO Georgia Office
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~294 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Georgia Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont Service Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont Service Group averages 2.4 TCR (86% of the Central air-conditioning equipment installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont Service Group TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Piedmont Service Group falls in its industry

5,793 Central air-conditioning equip establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 212 Central air-conditioning equip employers in North Carolina.

Piedmont Service Group (294 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont Service Group
Piedmont Service Group (294 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Piedmont Service Group has more employees than the Central air-conditioning equipment insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.9 8 0 0
2023 2.1 1.4 6 0 0
2022 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2019 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2018 2.2 0.4 5 1 0
2017 4.5 3.4 12 0 0
2016 7.2 2.1 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NC · Raleigh

5,793 Central air-conditioning equipment installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Georgia Office 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell Plumbing, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walker Mechanical Contractors 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2433_4426 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bernhard MCC, LLC - Raleigh 294 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairfield 294 FTE
STATE-SIZE Qorvo - 7908 294 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0966 - Huntersville 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR East Coast Metal Structures Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR W.A. Klinger, L.L.C. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TXHO2 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlisle Karns Food Store 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MKS Shattuck Rd 294 FTE
NAT-SIZE AstraZeneca Newark Facility 294 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodward FST Inc. 294 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Facility 294 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.