Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · North Dakota

Pierce Lee Roofing

Fargo, ND · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pierce Lee Roofing runs at 764% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial and Institutional Building Construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Pierce Lee Roofing: 22.2 TCR = 764% of Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pierce Lee Roofing safety composite

Pierce Lee Roofing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pierce Lee Roofing: 9.9 → 21.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 42.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2021

Pierce Lee Roofing's TCR rose 11.2 from 9.9 in 2016 to 21.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 42.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.2 · 764% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #31/31
  • PHOTO NMU Housing Project
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NMU Housing Project (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Pierce Lee Roofing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pierce Lee Roofing averages 22.2 TCR (764% of the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pierce Lee Roofing TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=42.8 · 2018=29.6 · 2019=15.9 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=21.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Pierce Lee Roofing falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial and Institutional B establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 31 Commercial and Institutional B employers in North Dakota.

Pierce Lee Roofing (30 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pierce Lee Roofing
Pierce Lee Roofing (30 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Pierce Lee Roofing has fewer employees than the Commercial and Institutional Building Co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.1 5.3 4 0 0
2020 13.7 4.6 3 0 0
2019 15.9 0.0 4 0 0
2018 29.6 7.4 8 0 0
2017 42.8 3.6 12 0 0
2016 9.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · ND · Fargo

4,692 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NMU Housing Project 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cen Cal Builders and Developers Inc. 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gronen Restoration Inc. 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR E.L. Shea, Inc. 22.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LLS Dickinson 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Transmission System Maintenance 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northridge Construction, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fargo RMX 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Crest View Corporation 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZEFH 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop Pdc Distribution Freetown 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LNH-Renton 22.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Electric 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Reno 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversco 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richards Packaging, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.