Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Arizona

Pima County Juvenile Court Center

Tucson, AZ · ~336 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pima County Juvenile Court Center runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade B.

Pima County Juvenile Court Center: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pima County Juvenile Court Center safety composite

Pima County Juvenile Court Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pima County Juvenile Court Center: 0.1 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2021

Pima County Juvenile Court Center's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.1 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #15/39
  • PHOTO COH City Hall
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~336 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: COH City Hall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Pima County Juvenile Court Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pima County Juvenile Court Center averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pima County Juvenile Court Center TCR series: 2018=0.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Pima County Juvenile Court Center falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 39 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Arizona.

Pima County Juvenile Court Center (336 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pima County Juvenile Court Center
Pima County Juvenile Court Center (336 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Pima County Juvenile Court Center has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.8 3.1 9 1 0
2020 4.4 2.7 13 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 11 1 0
2018 0.1 0.1 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · AZ · Tucson

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR COH City Hall 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Midland - Dial-A-Ride 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of East Granby Town Hall 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks and Recreation Department 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbert Head Office 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Industrial Resources Corp 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diversified Roofing 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOWAN MILLING LLC 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Ostroff Electrical Contractors, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Altek, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SRT 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Campus Residential 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Distribution Center 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spectrum Brands 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recycling 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Virginia Beach 300 Centre Pointe Dr 336 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.