Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di · Minnesota

Pinnacle Services Inc

Minneapolis, MN · ~280 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pinnacle Services Inc runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di workplace, earning a grade B.

Pinnacle Services Inc: 2.8 TCR = 73% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pinnacle Services Inc safety composite

Pinnacle Services Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2021

Pinnacle Services Inc injury rate improved

Pinnacle Services Inc's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.1 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #16/44
  • PHOTO Firestone Park
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Firestone Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Pinnacle Services Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pinnacle Services Inc averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pinnacle Services Inc TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Pinnacle Services Inc falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 44 Activity centers for disabled employers in Minnesota.

Pinnacle Services Inc (280 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pinnacle Services Inc
Pinnacle Services Inc (280 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pinnacle Services Inc has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2020 2.2 0.6 4 0 0
2019 4.4 3.8 7 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Minneapolis

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Firestone Park 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DREW CO HOME CARE 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercy LIFE West Philadelphia 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAR Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Anderson Dahlen Inc 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterous Company 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5992 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill-Rom Respiratory Care 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Del Tura 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ariel Mt. Vernon 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Communications Electronics- Jessup 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ore City finishing plant 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yakima Valley School 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beckett 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sensient Natural Ingredients, Turlock 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilhelm, LLC 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.