Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing · Minnesota

pinta elements, INC

Minneapolis, MN · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

pinta elements, INC runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

pinta elements, INC: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

pinta elements, INC safety composite

pinta elements, INC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2018→2024

pinta elements, INC injury rate improved

pinta elements, INC's TCR fell 4.4 from 7.1 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.1 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=11.5 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Bridgestone APM FPD #5
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridgestone APM FPD #5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

pinta elements, INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows pinta elements, INC averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

pinta elements, INC TCR series: 2018=7.1 · 2019=4 · 2020=11.5 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where pinta elements, INC falls in its industry

474 Packaging, foam plastics (exce establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Packaging, foam plastics (exce employers in Minnesota.

pinta elements, INC (62 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate pinta elements, INC
pinta elements, INC (62 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

pinta elements, INC has fewer employees than the Packaging, foam plastics (except polysty median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2020 11.5 4.9 7 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 7.1 1.8 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · MN · Minneapolis

474 Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridgestone APM FPD #5 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champagne 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leggett & Platt 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC - Dublin 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pipestone System Services 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sports Group 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueLinx Corporation Aitkin 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nor-Son Construction 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Lrd Laredo International Airport 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Mine Equipment Company 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 810 22nd Ave Greeley Co 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Refrigeration Sales Inc 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Direct Fitness Solutions LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 203 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bedford Springs Health and Rehab 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose of Midland 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.