Plating metals and metal products for the trade · Wisconsin

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay

Green Bay, WI · ~196 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay: 5.4 TCR = 164% of Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay safety composite

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay held a steady TCR band

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=6.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #16/23
  • PHOTO Danco EN
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Danco EN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay averages 5.4 TCR (164% of the Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=6.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay falls in its industry

585 Plating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 23 Plating metals and metal produ employers in Wisconsin.

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay (196 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay
Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay (196 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Pioneer Metal Finishing Green Bay has more employees than the Plating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 3.2 8 0 0
2020 4.7 1.0 8 1 0
2019 7.4 7.4 16 0 0
2017 6.4 3.4 15 0 0
2016 4.3 1.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · WI · Green Bay

585 Plating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Danco EN 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santoshi Corporation 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enduro Industries LLC - Hannibal Plant 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huggins Metal Finishing, Inc. 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Marine a division of Michels Construction, Inc-WI-Lomira 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ortega 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radius Packaging 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips-Medisize-Eau Claire 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Gravity Factory 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans food group Ohio 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Regional Medical Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Online Sales 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliver 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robinson CUSD #2 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE IPS Plumbing Group 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.