Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ

Pittsburgh, PA · ~98 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade A.

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ safety composite

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2021

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ injury rate improved

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/38
  • PHOTO Intigral-Twinsburg
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Intigral-Twinsburg (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ falls in its industry

441 Glass, automotive, made from p establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 38 Glass, automotive, made from p employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ (98 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ (98 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - PGW HQ has more employees than the Glass, automotive, made from purchased g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · PA · Pittsburgh

441 Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Intigral-Twinsburg 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sage Electrochromics Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waxahachie CG 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fargo IG 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin Labs D/B/A Trulieve 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oregon Maintenance Shop 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hankin Group 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daniel J. Keating 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Prime Controls Sugar Land 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (30) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspen Contracting Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackline Midland Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHEP Albany Service Center (USXP) 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiberon - Meridian 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE 174136-Jeffersonville Po 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edenton Plant 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.