Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System

Pittsburgh, PA · ~222 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) workplace, earning a grade C.

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System: 4.2 TCR = 109% of Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System safety composite

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2021

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System injury rate improved

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.5 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=8.3 · 2021=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622210 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #15/51
  • PHOTO Silver Oaks Behavior…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silver Oaks Behavioral Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh Mercy Health System averages 4.2 TCR (109% of the Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=8.3 · 2021=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Pittsburgh Mercy Health System falls in its industry

872 Psychiatric hospitals (except establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 51 Psychiatric hospitals (except employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System (222 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 6.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh Mercy Health System
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System (222 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 6.7

Pittsburgh Mercy Health System has more employees than the Psychiatric hospitals (except convalesce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.1 0.8 4 0 0
2019 8.3 3.2 11 2 0
2018 1.7 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622210 · PA · Pittsburgh

872 Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silver Oaks Behavioral Hospital 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR A246 - Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avera Behavioral Health Hospital 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2576-07141063-1063 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GFM 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Empire 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-PHI 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE hanover Foods Canning 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Tappahannock Hospital 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CFP Arbuckle 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Solar Sun Headquarters 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - Fallbrook 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice : BAKERSFIELD 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carthage Warehouse 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer118 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.