Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Technologies Group

New Kensington, PA · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh Technologies Group runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pittsburgh Technologies Group: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh Technologies Group safety composite

Pittsburgh Technologies Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2019→2024

Pittsburgh Technologies Group injury rate improved

Pittsburgh Technologies Group's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · New Kensington, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/33
  • PHOTO Mold Craft
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mold Craft (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh Technologies Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh Technologies Group averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh Technologies Group TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pittsburgh Technologies Group falls in its industry

448 Injection molding machinery fo establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 33 Injection molding machinery fo employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh Technologies Group (30 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh Technologies Group
Pittsburgh Technologies Group (30 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Pittsburgh Technologies Group has fewer employees than the Injection molding machinery for plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · PA · New Kensington

448 Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 33 employers in New Kensington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mold Craft 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Almex USA, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nalco, an Ecolab Company 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayward Industries - Sales - All States 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Maytown 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE BJE Poultry 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Energy Resources, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Patriot, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polyconcept North America 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leedsworld, Inc. 868 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips 312 New Kensington 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innomotics, LLC 478 FTE
NAT-TCR Galax Grants 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Division 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit ESP - Tulsa, OK 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR WithersRavenel 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Birtley Industrial Equipment Corp. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alexandria Day Services 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntsman East Lansing Site 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawton Mechanical Contractors 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.