Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel · Pennsylvania

PK Aliquippa Plant

Aliquippa, PA · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PK Aliquippa Plant runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade F.

PK Aliquippa Plant: 11.6 TCR = 351% of Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PK Aliquippa Plant safety composite

PK Aliquippa Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.2

2016→2022

PK Aliquippa Plant injury rate improved

PK Aliquippa Plant's TCR fell 17.2 from 19.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.1 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=22.4 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Aliquippa, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 351% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/29
  • PHOTO Bellis Steel Company…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bellis Steel Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

PK Aliquippa Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PK Aliquippa Plant averages 11.6 TCR (351% of the Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PK Aliquippa Plant TCR series: 2016=19.1 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=22.4 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where PK Aliquippa Plant falls in its industry

206 Bars, steel, made in cold roll establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 29 Bars, steel, made in cold roll employers in Pennsylvania.

PK Aliquippa Plant (49 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PK Aliquippa Plant
PK Aliquippa Plant (49 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

PK Aliquippa Plant has fewer employees than the Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 8.8 1.8 5 0 0
2020 5.3 1.8 3 0 0
2018 22.4 6.1 10 1 0
2017 12.2 4.1 6 0 0
2016 19.1 4.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · PA · Aliquippa

206 Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 34 employers in Aliquippa, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bellis Steel Company Inc 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arcos Industries LLC 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roller Die-Louisville 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Roll Forming & Mfg 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaver County Rehabilitation Center, Inc. - CenterPlace 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardex, L.P. Corporate Office 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moderne Glass Co., Inc. 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIFE Beaver/Lawrence 258 FTE
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100635 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01988 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01119 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 240077-Bos-Fenway Carrier Anx 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TAC Air - LIT 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE C Dairy LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. O. Smith Corporation, Apcom Protective Coatings Division 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greeley Village 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.