Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Mississippi

Plant Moselle

Moselle, MS · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plant Moselle runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Plant Moselle: 3.8 TCR = 319% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plant Moselle safety composite

Plant Moselle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Plant Moselle held a steady TCR band

Plant Moselle's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Moselle, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 319% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO Harrington Station-031
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harrington Station-031 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Plant Moselle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plant Moselle averages 3.8 TCR (319% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plant Moselle TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Plant Moselle falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Electric power generation, fos employers in Mississippi.

Plant Moselle (65 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plant Moselle
Plant Moselle (65 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Plant Moselle has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 1 2 0
2022 7.9 0.0 0 5 0
2021 4.5 0.0 0 3 0
2020 17.4 14.2 0 11 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MS · Moselle

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 13 employers in Moselle, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harrington Station-031 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Big Creek 8 PH 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heorot Power Management - Hardin 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Public Utilities 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adcamp Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Vicksburg 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE VIP Cinema Plant 2 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAPA Jackson Distribution Center 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Hens, Inc. KP 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kill Plant 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Plant 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Hens, Inc. SP 242 FTE
NAT-TCR Coastal Masonry, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Twining, Inc. San Diego 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Steenberg Watrud Construction LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JRL Ventures LLC - Sarasota 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - SHR 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jim Fisher Roofing & Construction, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wise Electric Cooperative - Decatur 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Payne Chevrolet Inc 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.