Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing · Arkansas

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant

Fort Smith, AR · ~300 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant: 0.9 TCR = 22% of Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant safety composite

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2018

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant injury rate improved

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311911 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Nutkao USA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~300 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nutkao USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant averages 0.9 TCR (22% of the Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.7 · BLS 4.1

Where Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant falls in its industry

150 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, employers in Arkansas.

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant (300 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant
Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant (300 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Planters - Ft. Smith Arkansas Plant has more employees than the Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311911 · AR · Fort Smith

150 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nutkao USA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modesto Specialty Food Ingredients 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyoming 3300 Manufacturig Facility 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hormel Foods Corporation LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Planters - Fort Smith 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6801 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Bakeries, LLC 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 128 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Schilli Corp 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Longhorn Plant 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Hermann Medical Group 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Certech: Wood-Ridge, NJ 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE USDA/ARS/WRRC 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kate Spade Corporate NJ 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westwood Hills Nursing & Rehab 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Mechanical and Engineering Contractors Inc. AZ 300 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.