Plasmapheresis centers · North Carolina

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC

Asheville, NC · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plasmapheresis centers workplace, earning a grade B.

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC: 2.3 TCR = 62% of Plasmapheresis centers BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC safety composite

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2019

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC injury rate improved

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/59
  • PHOTO Morrow, GA-Biolife 737
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morrow, GA-Biolife 737 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC averages 2.3 TCR (62% of the Plasmapheresis centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC falls in its industry

1,713 Plasmapheresis centers establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 59 Plasmapheresis centers employers in North Carolina.

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC (43 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC
Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC (43 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Plasma Biological Services - Asheville, NC has fewer employees than the Plasmapheresis centers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.9 2.3 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · NC · Asheville

1,713 Plasmapheresis centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morrow, GA-Biolife 737 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN RED CROSS - 650 COLISEUM DR 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calexico-3rd Street, CA - Biomat 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BioTek America,LLC - Paducah 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LEWIS NURSERY 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Man Farming INC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NC Grow Out 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Bern Complex 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Baker Distributing 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North Meridian Surgery Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ruiz Food Products 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Remington Arms Company - Lonoke 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Texas 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amish Wedding Foods, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wehmeier Drywall, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Savourys Good Earth Cuisine 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.