Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing · Ohio

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc.

Piqua, OH · ~60 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. safety composite

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc.: 3.4 → 10.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.84× in 2024

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc.'s TCR rose 7.2 from 3.4 in 2016 to 10.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Piqua, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #35/44
  • PHOTO Cadillac Products Pa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cadillac Products Packaging Company Paris Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

396 Film, plastics, packaging, man establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 44 Film, plastics, packaging, man employers in Ohio.

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc.
Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Plastic Recycling Technology, Inc. has fewer employees than the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 10.6 6 0 0
2023 7.3 0.0 4 0 0
2022 8.9 3.6 5 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 7.4 5.5 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.8 5.3 5 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · OH · Piqua

396 Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 65 employers in Piqua, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cadillac Products Packaging Company Paris Plant 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 230 Industrial Drive 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Converting 2 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morris Packaging, LLC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE White House Fruit Farm Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wholesale 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Cleveland Habitat for Humanity West 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gutknecht Construction Company 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evenflo Company 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps and Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps & Systems Piqua 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3765 267 FTE
NAT-TCR ShopRite of Hackensack 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Savage 021 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR R29GY - Tower Office 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR American Compaction Equipment, INC. 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jamesburg - D014 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Recycling LLC Baton Rouge 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE South of Market Mental Health Services 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andrew J. Bartlett 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.