Gold and silver plating metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

Plating Technology, Inc.

Dayton, OH · ~66 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plating Technology, Inc. runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Gold and silver plating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Plating Technology, Inc.: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Gold and silver plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plating Technology, Inc. safety composite

Plating Technology, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

Plating Technology, Inc. injury rate improved

Plating Technology, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #43/62
  • PHOTO D&B Plating
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D&B Plating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Plating Technology, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plating Technology, Inc. averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Gold and silver plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plating Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Plating Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Gold and silver plating metals establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 62 Gold and silver plating metals employers in Ohio.

Plating Technology, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plating Technology, Inc.
Plating Technology, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Plating Technology, Inc. has more employees than the Gold and silver plating metals and metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2022 5.5 2.7 2 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 5.7 4.2 4 0 0
2018 7.6 5.7 4 0 0
2017 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2016 5.4 1.8 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · OH · Dayton

585 Gold and silver plating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D&B Plating 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anoplate Corporation 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tompkins Metal Finishing, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Plating Company 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poultry Service Associates Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowling Green 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGQ, Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ENGIE North America - OSU 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Martins Food Markets # 6283 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PHC at Lauren's House-Chester County 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR John E. Fullerton, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 001 Warehouse 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aei Electrical Construction, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Concrete Cutting, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Able Coil & Electronics Co Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dme Company 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.