Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing · California

Platinum Performance

Buellton, CA · ~66 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Platinum Performance runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Platinum Performance: 3.7 TCR = 95% of Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Platinum Performance safety composite

Platinum Performance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2024

Platinum Performance injury rate improved

Platinum Performance's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.7 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Buellton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/36
  • PHOTO Frankford Feed Mill
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frankford Feed Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Platinum Performance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Platinum Performance averages 3.7 TCR (95% of the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Platinum Performance TCR series: 2017=9.7 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.9

Where Platinum Performance falls in its industry

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 36 Livestock feeds, supplements, employers in California.

Platinum Performance (66 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Platinum Performance
Platinum Performance (66 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Platinum Performance has more employees than the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.6 5.3 5 0 0
2018 5.8 4.3 4 0 0
2017 9.7 8.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · CA · Buellton

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Buellton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frankford Feed Mill 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MNWF-FSE-WILLMAR POULTRY FARMS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR QualiTech - D1 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lubbock Wildlife 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 153 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Vineyard Care Associates 647 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Barbara Operations 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-03324 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Westshore Honda 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Artiflex Mfg Clyde 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Faribault Grow Out 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danco 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brompton Heights, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE New England Appliance Group, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Poly Systems 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.