Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

Pleasant Valley ICF

Pleasant Valley, NY · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pleasant Valley ICF runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Pleasant Valley ICF: 17.7 TCR = 466% of Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pleasant Valley ICF safety composite

Pleasant Valley ICF scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pleasant Valley ICF: 0.0 → 31.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 36.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.78× in 2024

Pleasant Valley ICF's TCR rose 31.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 31.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Pleasant Valley, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.7 · 466% of ind

  • DART 31.4 DART
  • RANK #310/336
  • PHOTO 525 Prospect St
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 525 Prospect St (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Pleasant Valley ICF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pleasant Valley ICF averages 17.7 TCR (466% of the Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pleasant Valley ICF TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=17.6 · 2021=26.2 · 2022=36.8 · 2023=29.4 · 2024=31.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Pleasant Valley ICF falls in its industry

2,261 Intermediate care facilities, establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #310 safest of 336 Intermediate care facilities, employers in New York.

Pleasant Valley ICF (34 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pleasant Valley ICF
Pleasant Valley ICF (34 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Pleasant Valley ICF has fewer employees than the Intermediate care facilities, intellectu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.4 31.4 1 3 0
2023 29.4 29.4 1 3 0
2022 36.8 29.4 1 4 0
2021 26.2 19.7 3 1 0
2020 17.6 11.8 1 2 0
2019 6.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.7 5.8 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Pleasant Valley

2,261 Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 10 employers in Pleasant Valley, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 525 Prospect St 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone Belt - SGL 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bison 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cutter Lane 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Consigli Construction NY, LLC 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-02632 FAC-02632-PLEASANT VALLEY-NY 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02632 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002632 70 FTE
NAT-TCR Geg-Ground Ops 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Building Systems 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kresson View 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Delivery Service Provider 17.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Town of Normal - Water 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville, NC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detdc-B5510-Afh- Detroit Dc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE BDRIN-Lafayette 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.