Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location · California

Pleasanton

Pleasanton, CA · ~570 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pleasanton runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location workplace, earning a grade B.

Pleasanton: 1.9 TCR = 65% of Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pleasanton safety composite

Pleasanton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Pleasanton injury rate improved

Pleasanton's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722515 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/44
  • PHOTO Westborough (So. SF)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~570 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westborough (So. SF) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pleasanton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pleasanton averages 1.9 TCR (65% of the Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pleasanton TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Pleasanton falls in its industry

245 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 44 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, employers in California.

Pleasanton (570 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pleasanton
Pleasanton (570 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pleasanton has more employees than the Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.4 0.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.4 4.9 61 0 0
2018 5.6 3.7 15 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 2.4 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722515 · CA · Pleasanton

245 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westborough (So. SF) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 239 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jeremiah's Italian Ice 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORD Joint Venture/O'Briens Restaurant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Redwood Empire Vineyard Management 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA CUT/SNACK 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 17 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 15 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Century Electric Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Event Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FXI, Inc. - Terrell 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reading 570 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parker Hannifin Control Systems Division - Ogden 570 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Archbald Kennedy Dr (1547) 570 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main 570 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.